<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ironing Wrinkles out of Contracting &#8211; discussion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crackerjacks.co.nz/news/ironing-wrinkles-out-of-contracting-discussion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crackerjacks.co.nz/news/ironing-wrinkles-out-of-contracting-discussion/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:55:58 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Trafford</title>
		<link>http://www.crackerjacks.co.nz/news/ironing-wrinkles-out-of-contracting-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Trafford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 07:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crackerjacks.co.nz/?p=285#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Crackerjacks&#039; comparison of its recruitment model to older agency models is similar to the difference between how my ex-employer sought to operate and the older model of its competitors. They sought alliance-style contracts with integration of some business systems while the competitors stuck to traditional bid-and-win contracts. Where the ex-employer lost out was that the alliance contract became stale, and the benefits of close relationships were lost through stubbornly increasing distrust. I believe they have been sent back to compete with their competitors in the traditional way. Perhaps it could&#039;ve continued to work had they regularly brought out something new to keep the client attached to the idea. However I&#039;m pretty sure they made plenty of money during the alliance&#039;s success, so good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crackerjacks&#8217; comparison of its recruitment model to older agency models is similar to the difference between how my ex-employer sought to operate and the older model of its competitors. They sought alliance-style contracts with integration of some business systems while the competitors stuck to traditional bid-and-win contracts. Where the ex-employer lost out was that the alliance contract became stale, and the benefits of close relationships were lost through stubbornly increasing distrust. I believe they have been sent back to compete with their competitors in the traditional way. Perhaps it could&#8217;ve continued to work had they regularly brought out something new to keep the client attached to the idea. However I&#8217;m pretty sure they made plenty of money during the alliance&#8217;s success, so good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

